skill-reviewer

Code review report generation is done by applying appropriate review checklists to a codebase, grouping findings by severity, and providing remediation guidance with explicit checklist IDs and suggested fixes.

Repository auditing supports simultaneous documentation and security reviews by dynamically loading relevant checklists from references based on content, producing a unified structured audit report.

Checklist-driven audit identifies the review type, dynamically loads matching checklists from references, evaluates the codebase, and outputs a formal report with evidence references and actionable remediation guidance.

Standardizing subjective reviews requires turning assessments into structured, checklist-driven evaluations, separating standards in reference files from review logic to ensure consistent and repeatable audits.

Extending new review types is supported by separating standards in references files from review logic, allowing you to add new checklists for different review types without altering the core logic.

Remediation guidance includes explicit checklist IDs like PY-xx, SEC-xx, or DOC-xx, alongside suggested fixes and evidence references mapped directly to the identified severity groupings.