speckit-clarify

To resolve ambiguities in feature specifications, you can use a structured interactive workflow that scans functional requirements, data models, interactions, and non-functional criteria, then records clarifications directly into the spec. This enforces alignment before planning begins.

The best way to clarify underspecified requirements is through an interactive, capped-question loop that limits inquiries to five questions, driving stakeholder alignment while automatically integrating the answers into a Clarifications section of the spec.

Structured spec clarification prevents rework by surfacing and capturing gaps across functional requirements and non-functional criteria early, validating readiness, and ensuring all stakeholders are aligned before the planning phase initiates.

Yes, you can limit clarification questions during specification validation. The workflow enforces a strict cap of up to five questions per session, ensuring stakeholders face a constrained, efficient alignment process without endless questioning.

Yes, spec clarification automatically integrates resolved answers into the original specification document under a dedicated Clarifications section, providing per-session tracking and validating readiness before moving to planning.

You should not use an interactive Q&A approach for requirement validation when a specification is already fully detailed, as the ambiguity scanning targets underspecified features and the five-question cap may be insufficient for severely incomplete specs.