srp-editor

Repair and normalize SRP cards to preserve review semantics and truthful dispositions.

4|1|Updated Feb 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/danielbaustin/agent-design-language --skill srp-editor
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: srp-editor
Source: https://github.com/danielbaustin/agent-design-language/tree/main/adl/tools/skills/srp-editor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/danielbaustin/agent-design-language --skill srp-editor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Normalize and correct an SRP review card so it preserves Structured Review Prompt semantics, review-result truth, finding dispositions, and residual-risk boundaries. Use when an srp.md is missing, still uses legacy Structured Review Policy scaffolding, lacks review results, or overclaims review completion.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Normalize artifact_type to structured_review_prompt and align headings with SRP semantics
  • Preserve the policy instructions, reviewer scope, findings, dispositions, and residual risks
  • Enforce truthful review results, proper dispositions, and bounded handoffs across SRP lifecycles
  • Support bounded edits without publishing, merging, or circumventing validation

Quick Start

Edit the current srp.md to normalize structure, preserve truthfulness of findings, and update dispositions and residual risks.

Frequently Asked Questions about srp-editor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I normalize a structured review prompt card to preserve truthful findings and dispositions?

Normalize an SRP card by enforcing structured-field corrections and explicit evidence requirements, producing a bounded, publish-ready state. This preserves Structured Review Prompt semantics, truthful review results, and accurate dispositions without overclaiming review completion.

What is the best way to fix a legacy structured review policy scaffolding that lacks review results?

Repair legacy Structured Review Policy scaffolding by replacing it with Structured Review Prompt semantics, enforcing structured-field corrections, and applying explicit evidence requirements. This produces a bounded, publish-ready SRP state with accurate dispositions.

Can I edit an SRP draft with linked STP, SIP, SPP, or SOR artifacts without merging or publishing?

Yes, you can perform bounded edits on an SRP draft with linked STP, SIP, SPP, or SOR artifacts without publishing, merging, or circumventing validation. This maintains consistent scope, instructions, findings, and residual risks across objects within safe editing limits.

How do I enforce accurate residual risk boundaries during structured review prompt normalization?

Enforce accurate residual-risk boundaries during structured review prompt normalization by applying structured-field corrections and explicit evidence requirements. This preserves reviewer scope and ensures bounded handoffs across the SRP lifecycle.

Why does my SRP card overclaim review completion and how do I correct it?

An SRP card overclaims review completion when it lacks proper dispositions or explicit evidence requirements. Correct it by normalizing the artifact_type to structured_review_prompt, enforcing truthful review results, and updating dispositions and residual risks.