strategy-alliance

Map stakeholders by interest, position, and capacity for coalition planning.

212|23|Updated May 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity --skill strategy-alliance
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: strategy-alliance
Source: https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/tree/main/skills/strategy-alliance
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity --skill strategy-alliance

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps you figure out who you should ally with, who you should keep neutral, and which proposed alliances are likely to hold under real pressure rather than goodwill.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Party mapping for real interests: Inventories stakeholders by actual interest, current position, and capacity to help or hurt your objective.
  • Alliance vs neutralization planning: Distinguishes natural allies, swing parties (with specific alignment conditions), and parties to neutralize (seeking non-interference).
  • Stability assessment with the Machiavelli test: Evaluates whether each alliance rests on shared interest, reciprocal obligation, goodwill, or fear, and flags alliances that would fail if incentives change.

Quick Start

Use strategy-alliance to map the stakeholders in your coalition-building situation and get a prioritized plan for allies, swing parties, and neutralizations.

Frequently Asked Questions about strategy-alliance

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I map stakeholders for coalition building in organizational politics?

Stakeholder mapping for coalition building inventories parties by their actual interests, current positions, and capacity to help or hurt your objective. This reveals real alignment drivers rather than relying on stated preferences or goodwill alone.

What is the Machiavelli test for evaluating alliance stability?

The Machiavelli test evaluates whether an alliance rests on shared interest, reciprocal obligation, goodwill, or fear. It flags proposed coalitions that would fail under real pressure if underlying incentives or constraints shift.

How do I identify swing parties and neutralization targets in stakeholder management?

Identify swing parties by mapping their specific alignment conditions, while neutralization targets are stakeholders where you seek non-interference. Distinguishing these roles enables a prioritized plan for allies, swings, and neutralizations.

Can coalition strategy handle competitive scenarios where incentives drive outcomes more than stated preferences?

Coalition strategy applies directly to political, organizational, and stakeholder-management scenarios where interests, incentives, and constraints drive outcomes. It requires a party inventory and interest-position-capacity mapping to function effectively.

When should I not rely on goodwill for building alliances?

Avoid relying on goodwill when incentives are likely to change under pressure. The Machiavelli test helps flag alliances based purely on goodwill, showing whether shared interest, reciprocal obligation, or fear provide a more stable foundation.

What's the best way to plan an alliance strategy with a party inventory?

The best way to plan an alliance strategy is to inventory stakeholders by interest, position, and capacity, then categorize them as natural allies, swing parties, or neutralization targets to generate a prioritized, condition-based alignment plan.