supervisor-review-queue

Manage professor approval workflows for student legal drafts via a review queue.

100|16|Updated May 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill supervisor-review-queue-zekaisuni
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: supervisor-review-queue
Source: https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/tree/main/legal-clinic/skills/supervisor-review-queue
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill supervisor-review-queue-zekaisuni

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill solves the problem of coordinating a formal approval gate for student-produced legal work so that nothing goes to clients or courts without professor review.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Formal review gating: Activates only when the clinic’s supervision style is set to "formal review queue", otherwise stays dormant.
  • Queue visibility by urgency and student: Surfaces pending items, highlights deadline-sensitive work, and groups by student patterns.
  • Decision actions with auditability: Supports approve, edit-then-approve, and return with professor notes, recording each action in the clinic log.

Quick Start

Ask the skill to show what is currently waiting in the supervisor review queue and prioritize deadline-sensitive items.

Frequently Asked Questions about supervisor-review-queue

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I set up a formal review queue for student legal drafts in a clinic?

To set up a formal review queue for student legal drafts, configure the clinic's CLAUDE.md supervision style to "formal review queue". This activates the approval workflow, ensuring no student outputs reach clients or courts without professor review.

Can I edit a student's legal case drafting output before approving it?

Yes, the review workflow supports an edit-then-approve action for student legal drafts. This allows professors to make teaching-oriented edits to case drafting outputs before final approval, recording the action and any professor notes in the clinic log.

How does audit logging work when returning student drafts for revision?

When returning student drafts, audit logging records the return action and professor notes directly in the clinic log. This ensures a formal, trackable record of all approval, edit-then-approve, and return decisions made during the supervision workflow.

Does the supervisor approval workflow stay dormant if not explicitly enabled?

Yes, the supervisor approval workflow remains dormant unless the clinic's supervision style is explicitly set to "formal review queue". This prevents the review gating from activating in clinic environments that do not require strict professor approval.