ta-framework-builder

Evaluate candidate theories and operationalize core concepts into coding-ready definitions for thematic analysis.

265|23|Updated Feb 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yipng05-max/-skills --skill ta-framework-builder
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ta-framework-builder
Source: https://github.com/yipng05-max/-skills/tree/main/ta-framework-builder
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yipng05-max/-skills --skill ta-framework-builder

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It solves the problem of researchers being unsure how to position theory in thematic analysis before coding, which leads to inconsistent theme naming and weak justification in the paper.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Theory positioning guide (A/B/C): helps you choose whether your TA is theory-driven, experience-driven, or guided by sensitizing concepts, so theory and data have a clear relationship.
  • Candidate theory evaluation: structures comparison across explanatory power, boundary conditions, TA epistemology compatibility, and internal tensions/limitations.
  • Operationalization of core concepts: turns abstract theoretical concepts into concrete identification criteria that later TA-writing tools can directly use.
  • Framework document output: produces a structured, paper-ready framework file that can be consumed by downstream workflow steps.

Quick Start

Use ta-framework-builder to generate a framework document for your thematic analysis by providing your research question, core phenomenon, candidate theories, and 3–6 core concepts to operationalize.

Frequently Asked Questions about ta-framework-builder

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I build a theoretical framework for thematic analysis before coding?

To build a theoretical framework for thematic analysis, you provide your research question, core phenomenon, candidate theories, and 3–6 core concepts to operationalize into coding-ready definitions. The skill outputs a structured framework document for downstream thematic coding and academic writing.

What is the difference between theory-driven and experience-driven thematic analysis?

Theory-driven thematic analysis uses established theories to guide coding, while experience-driven approaches derive themes from participant data. A third option uses sensitizing concepts as flexible guides. The skill helps you evaluate and position your stance to clarify the relationship between theory and data.

How do I operationalize theoretical concepts into coding-ready definitions for qualitative research?

Operationalizing theoretical concepts involves turning abstract ideas into concrete identification criteria. The skill guides you through this process by taking 3–6 core concepts from your chosen theory and transforming them into definitions that can be directly applied during thematic coding.

How do I compare candidate theories for a qualitative research paper?

Comparing candidate theories requires evaluating explanatory power, boundary conditions, epistemology compatibility, and internal tensions. The skill structures this comparison to help you select the most appropriate theoretical framework for your thematic analysis.

Do I need a structured theoretical framework document before starting thematic coding?

Yes, a structured theoretical framework document is required as a checkpoint before thematic coding. It prevents inconsistent theme naming and weak justification in your paper by ensuring theory and data have a clear, operationalized relationship.

Can I use sensitizing concepts instead of a full theory in thematic analysis?

Yes, you can use sensitizing concepts as a middle-ground stance between theory-driven and experience-driven approaches. The skill supports this positioning, allowing flexible theoretical guidance without rigid structural constraints during your thematic analysis.