What problem does it solve?
Generic AI-generated safety paperwork for bulk chemical storage is often rejected by regulators for being vague, lacking properly ranked controls, and leaking sensitive personnel data. This skill eliminates that risk by forcing specificity, applying the hierarchy of controls, enforcing strict de-identification, and requiring domain-expert review before any output is shared.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Structured Intake: Forces users to provide specific inputs (stored substances, tank volumes, configuration, jurisdiction) before any assessment is drafted, refusing to proceed on vague requests.
- Hierarchy-of-Control Ranked Assessments: Evaluates secondary containment, segregation of incompatible substances, overfill protection, and firewater containment with controls ranked from elimination to PPE, each tied to named owners and review dates.
- Jurisdiction-Specific Compliance: Supports UK/EU DSEAR flammable-atmosphere requirements and India PESO state-level storage licensing rules, with all citations traced to verified knowledge base fragments.
- Use Case: A process safety manager at a fuel depot needs to assess their 3-tank solvent bund sizing and overfill protection controls. This skill first elicits the exact stored substances, volumes, local containment rule, and jurisdiction, then produces a defensible, regulator-ready assessment with traceable evidence and hierarchy-of-controls-ranked remediation actions.
Quick Start
Use the tank-farm-bunding-controls skill to assess your bulk storage tank farm's bunding, secondary containment, and overfill controls by providing the stored substances, tank volumes, and storage configuration when prompted.
