tc-review

To detect Simplified Chinese character leaks in Traditional Chinese documentation, you can run a pre-publication review that flags direct Simplified characters and Mainland-specific phrasing while preserving technical terms and identifiers.

The best way to check Traditional Chinese text for Taiwan engineer fluency is to enforce sentence naturalness during the review process, minimizing improper English insertions and awkward translationese while maintaining technical precision.

Yes, you can review code documentation for Mainland-specific vocabulary without altering API names and paths, because the review process explicitly preserves all technical constraints, identifiers, commands, and file paths.

Pre-publication review for Traditional Chinese content does provide localized issue lists with positions or line references when reviewing files or others' documents, while offering silent self-correction for your own chat replies.

Traditional Chinese writing contains awkward translationese and unnecessary English insertion when sentence flow is not properly localized, requiring a fluency enforcement check to reduce inappropriate ordinary English words while keeping technical terms intact.

You need a Simplified Chinese leak detection check for your Traditional Chinese content during any pre-publication check for 繁中-facing material, including chat replies, README files, plan documents, and review documents.