terms-review

What problem does it solve?

Publishing consumer product terms of service, EULAs, or public offers with clauses invalid under Russian law exposes businesses to legal penalties, consumer refund claims, and unenforceable terms, while missing mandatory disclosures can lead to regulatory fines from consumer protection authorities.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Document Type Classification: Automatically identifies if a draft is a public offer, EULA, public contract, or accession contract per Russian Civil Code articles 426, 428, 437, and 1235.
• Mandatory Element Validation: Checks for all required disclosures per Russian consumer protection law (ЗЗПП) including seller identification with OGRN/INN, final pricing with VAT, delivery terms, warranty information, and complaint contact details.
• Red-Flag Clause Detection: Flags automatically invalid unfair clauses such as forced dispute jurisdiction in the seller's location, non-cash refunds via bonuses or promo codes, unilateral term changes, and overbroad personal data consent.
• Product-Specific Compliance Checks: Provides tailored checks for SaaS, marketplace, and financial service products including 7-day cooling-off periods for remote sales, SLA requirements, marketplace seller responsibility rules, and full credit cost disclosures for financial products.
• Use Case: A product team launching a new consumer SaaS in Russia can use this skill to review their draft terms before publication to avoid invalid clauses and meet all regulatory requirements.

Quick Start

Use the terms-review skill to audit the draft terms of service for your new Russian consumer SaaS product and get a list of invalid clauses and missing mandatory disclosures.