What problem does it solve? Qualitative analysis of feedback, tickets, reviews, and interviews often mixes incompatible methodological schools, producing themes that are really topic summaries, unjustified agreement statistics, and claims with no traceable evidence. This Skill enforces one coherent school end to end so every theme is a defensible claim backed by verbatim extracts and corpus-bounded counts. ## Core Features & Use Cases - School selection and enforcement: Choose among reflexive, codebook, template, framework matrix, rapid, and hybrid approaches, with the choice and its reason recorded and quality standards taken from the same school. - Bounded codebook workflow: Build a codebook of 20 to 40 codes with definitions, inclusion and exclusion cues, and examples, then code every unit against it. - Evidence-backed reporting: Report each theme as a one-sentence claim with verbatim extracts, unit identifiers, and counts scoped to the corpus, plus agreement figures only where the school calls for them. - Use Case: Given 500 support tickets, run a framework-matrix analysis that charts cases against codes, develops 5 to 14 themes, and delivers a report a product team can act on with an explicit adaptation disclosure. ## Quick Start Analyze the attached customer interview transcripts with thematic analysis and report the main themes with supporting quotes.
