think

Apply the ADI-cycle to evaluate hypotheses for complex decisions.

44|125|Updated Feb 10, 2026

Search Tags:#thinking #reasoning #decision-making #structured-thinking #adi-cycle #cognitive-process

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/TserenTserenov/FMT-exocortex-template --skill think-tserentserenov

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: think
Source: https://github.com/TserenTserenov/FMT-exocortex-template/tree/main/.claude/skills/think
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TserenTserenov/FMT-exocortex-template --skill think-tserentserenov

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

ADI-cycle provides a structured reasoning framework to improve decision quality by guiding users through a repeatable set of cognitive steps.

Core Features & Use Cases

Abduction: generate multiple hypotheses to explore possibilities before deciding.
Deduction: check logical consistency, constraints, and potential issues.
Induction: collect evidence from code, docs, and repository patterns.
Audit: assess bias, diversify hypotheses, and surface counter-evidence.
Decide: select the best hypothesis and document rationale, uncertainties, and risks.
Use cases include complex architectural planning, debugging, and strategic decision-making.

Quick Start

Provide a complex scenario and apply the ADI-cycle to reach a justified conclusion.

Frequently Asked Questions about think

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I apply structured reasoning to evaluate complex architectural decisions?▼

Structured reasoning for architectural decisions applies the ADI-cycle: Abduction generates hypotheses, Deduction checks constraints, Induction gathers repository evidence, Audit assesses bias, and Decide documents the final rationale and risks.

What is the best way to use structured thinking for debugging complex scenarios?▼

Structured thinking for debugging generates multiple failure hypotheses via Abduction, tests logical consistency through Deduction, collects code evidence via Induction, and audits for bias before deciding on the root cause.

Can I use structured decision-making for strategic planning scenarios?▼

Yes, structured decision-making supports strategic planning by evaluating multiple hypotheses sequentially, capturing evidence, auditing cognitive bias, and explicitly documenting the rationale, uncertainties, and risks behind the chosen strategy.

How do I evaluate multiple hypotheses before making a decision?▼

Evaluating multiple hypotheses requires generating possibilities through Abduction, verifying logical consistency via Deduction, gathering evidence with Induction, and auditing for counter-evidence before final selection.

When do I need structured thinking for cognitive decision-making processes?▼

Structured thinking is needed for cognitive decision-making when facing complex scenarios like architectural planning or debugging, requiring sequential hypothesis evaluation, explicit rationale capture, and risk assessment to improve decision quality.

Does structured thinking work without external dependencies for planning scenarios?▼

Yes, structured thinking requires no external dependencies to execute planning scenarios, applying the ADI-cycle framework internally to evaluate hypotheses and document decisions.