tool-design

Design tool interfaces with schemas, error handling, and MCP naming.

3|Updated Mar 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/0xharryriddle/codex-field-kit --skill tool-design-0xharryriddle
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: tool-design
Source: https://github.com/0xharryriddle/codex-field-kit/tree/main/archive/upstream/chasebuild-agent-skills/context-engineering/skills/tool-design
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/0xharryriddle/codex-field-kit --skill tool-design-0xharryriddle

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Designing tool interfaces for agent systems is error-prone without a clear, shared standard. This skill provides a disciplined approach to describing tools, enforcing naming conventions, and outlining error handling, defaults, and behavior to reduce misuse and ambiguity.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Tool Description Engineering: standardized templates and patterns for describing tools, parameters, returns, and errors.
  • Consistency and Testing: guidelines to ensure uniform naming, structure, and evaluative testing across tools.
  • MCP naming and tool consolidation guidance: strategies to namespace tools and consolidate workflows for clarity.

Quick Start

Follow these guidelines to craft a precise, discovery-ready tool description for new agent tools.

Frequently Asked Questions about tool-design

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I design robust tool interfaces for agent systems?

Designing robust tool interfaces requires applying standardized templates for describing parameters, returns, and errors. This approach enforces naming conventions and outlines behavior to reduce ambiguity and misuse across multi-tool agent workflows.

What is tool description engineering for MCP-named tools?

Tool description engineering for MCP-named tools involves using standardized patterns to describe tool behavior and consolidating workflows through namespacing strategies. This ensures clarity and prevents errors in multi-tool agent environments.

How should I handle errors and return structures in agent tools?

Handling errors and return structures in agent tools requires outlining actionable error guidance and clear response formats. Standardized templates help define these structures, reducing misuse and providing explicit execution feedback.

Does this approach provide templates for testing and evaluating tool descriptions?

Yes, this approach provides specific templates for evaluation, testing, and documentation. These templates ensure your tool descriptions meet consistency requirements and perform reliably within multi-tool agent workflows.

What is the best way to consolidate multi-tool agent workflows?

The best way to consolidate multi-tool agent workflows is applying MCP naming and consolidation guidance. Namespacing strategies organize tool sets, ensuring clear planning, execution, and governance across the entire system.