What problem does it solve?
NIH funding data spans decades, mechanisms, and institutions, and naive queries produce misleading totals: null dollars read as zero, project-year rows get miscounted as awards, and acronym searches inflate results. This Skill turns the OpenNIH corpus into auditable funding analyses with explicit scopes, units, and evidence grades.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Portfolio and trend analysis: Track topic, Institute/Center, mechanism, and institution funding over time with reconciled pagination, distinct-award counting, and partial-year detection.
- Entity resolution: Disambiguate PIs and institutions through profile IDs and entity IDs instead of raw name substrings, preventing merged identities and inflated totals.
- Cross-source translational linking: Connect grants to PubMed publications, ClinicalTrials.gov studies, and other ToolUniverse sources using exact identifiers with F1/F2/X1/X2/X3 evidence grading.
- Use Case: A journalist asks whether NIH really spent $156M on maternal mortality research; the Skill decomposes the headline into one dominant OT2 coordinating-center award, compares title-text versus RCDC surfaces, and delivers an audit-ready explanation with public award links.
Quick Start
Ask the agent to analyze how NIH funding for a topic such as CRISPR changed from 2012 through 2025, including which Institutes drove it and which representative awards support the interpretation.