translation-review

Reviews existing translations for accuracy, consistency, tone, and length across language files.

3|Updated Aug 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Jose-Polanco-Oxte/Echos-Live-Music-Visualizer --skill translation-review-jose-polanco-oxte
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: translation-review
Source: https://github.com/Jose-Polanco-Oxte/Echos-Live-Music-Visualizer/tree/main/.agents/skills/localization/sub-skills/software-localization/translation-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Jose-Polanco-Oxte/Echos-Live-Music-Visualizer --skill translation-review-jose-polanco-oxte

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Translation files often accumulate mistranslations, inconsistent terminology, and awkward phrasing over time, and manually auditing every language file is slow and error-prone. This Skill performs a structured quality review of existing translations without modifying any files. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Multi-Dimension Quality Audit: Evaluates accuracy, consistency, tone and formality, naturalness, length and UI fit, variable integrity, and glossary compliance. - Severity-Grouped Findings: Classifies issues as Errors, Warnings, or Suggestions, each with a concrete proposed fix. - Cross-Language Comparison: Produces a summary table comparing quality ratings across all reviewed languages. - Use Case: After a release cycle, run a review on your French and German locale files to catch inconsistent terminology like mixed "Enregistrer"/"Sauvegarder" usage and flag strings that may overflow compact UI containers. ## Quick Start Review all my translation files for quality issues and suggest fixes, focusing on consistency and tone.

Frequently Asked Questions about translation-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review translation quality across multiple language files?

Run the translation review against your locale files to audit accuracy, consistency, tone, naturalness, and length. It compares each target language to the source and reports findings grouped by severity with suggested fixes.

How to check translation consistency for the same term in JSON locale files?

The review scans all keys in each language file and flags cases where the same source term is translated differently, such as "Save" rendered as both "Enregistrer" and "Sauvegarder". It also checks glossary mappings defined in the config.

Does the translation review modify my locale files?

No, the review is strictly read-only. It only reports issues and suggests corrections; you apply fixes separately, for example by running a translation sync skill afterward.

Can I review only one language or a specific quality dimension?

Yes, you can pass a language argument such as French, de, or ja to limit the scope, and a focus argument like tone, accuracy, consistency, or length to concentrate on one quality dimension.

What translation issues does the review detect besides mistranslations?

It detects inconsistent terminology, formality mismatches, unnatural phrasing, broken or missing variables, glossary violations, and translations that are too long or suspiciously short compared to the source, which may indicate UI overflow or truncation.