true-seeing

Verify ground truth by tracing claims to primary sources and actual behavior, piercing surface-level marketing language. This process reveals confirmed facts, identifies discrepancies between stated descriptions and real implementation, and highlights remaining uncertainties.

Claims verification is the process of tracing polished descriptions back to primary sources and actual behavior to expose discrepancies. It works by analyzing target documents or system descriptions to surface a ground-truth assessment including confirmed facts and identified gaps.

Identify discrepancies by analyzing the target documentation against primary sources and actual system behavior. This surfaces a ground-truth assessment that highlights gaps between stated descriptions and real implementation, clarifying what is genuinely true.

Yes, you need the Hermes Agent as the runtime environment to trace actual behavior beneath abstractions. Running the verification process requires this agent to output a complete ground-truth assessment including confirmed facts and remaining uncertainties.

The best way to surface confirmed facts is applying claims verification to trace overly polished descriptions to primary sources. This approach outputs a ground-truth assessment that explicitly distinguishes between confirmed facts, identified discrepancies, and remaining uncertainties.

Avoid ground-truth assessment when claims do not appear overly polished or require no verification against primary sources. The process is specifically designed for documents or system descriptions that hide actual behavior beneath marketing language and abstractions.