uberaccept

Adversarial acceptance enforces production rollout completion by requiring a red/green proof ledger and risk-mapped evidence audit. It soft-rejects completion claims until material blockers are gone and baseline versus change evidence matches the operational risk map.

Adversarial acceptance is a final review process for substantial coding or refactoring work that blocks premature completion claims. It enforces scope fidelity, verifies expected failures, and requires black-box operational checks rather than relying solely on unit test evidence.

A scope fidelity gate prevents scope drift by blocking completion unless the implemented scope directly matches the operator-original scope artifact. This ensures the final architecture shift or rewrite aligns exactly with the planned operational outcome contract.

Yes, adversarial acceptance applies to agentic-system changes and agentic workflows. It includes optional runtime topology validation for campaign or subagent work, and routes post-run learning to evolve the agentic system after acceptance.

Acceptance fails because operational outcome contract enforcement blocks claim-language blur. It requires concrete evidence for any implemented, operational, live, or adopted claims, preventing vague language from bypassing the production blocker gate.

Unit-only evidence is insufficient for production blocker gating because it misses user-visible and operational checks. Adversarial acceptance requires a safe-work exhaustion review and black-box proof audit to verify expected failures and first green proof.