uk-witness-statement-review

Review England and Wales civil witness statements for source support and CPR/PD risks.

46|25|Updated May 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-skills --skill uk-witness-statement-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: uk-witness-statement-review
Source: https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-skills/tree/main/skills/uk-witness-statement-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/LegalQuants/lq-skills --skill uk-witness-statement-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It helps users review England and Wales civil witness statements to identify unsupported facts, hearsay/source gaps, inconsistencies with the case documents, and CPR/PD drafting and compliance risks before signing and use in proceedings.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Paragraph-by-paragraph evidential review that classifies content (first-hand fact, hearsay/reported fact, belief/inference, argument, legal conclusion, procedural background, exhibit reference, needs_source).
  • Source support and conflict checking by tying factual assertions to supplied documents and flagging missing sources and documentary conflicts.
  • Drafting and procedural risk flags including argument/speculation/hearsay issues and checks related to statement-of-truth and PD 57AC where applicable.
  • Lawyer/witness escalation support with suggested fixes and questions for the witness or solicitor.

Quick Start

Ask it to review your England and Wales draft witness statement against your exhibits and chronology and produce an issue table plus a questions list for the responsible lawyer.

Frequently Asked Questions about uk-witness-statement-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a witness statement for CPR compliance before service?

To review a witness statement for CPR compliance, classify each paragraph by evidential type, flag unsupported assertions and hearsay, and check statement-of-truth and exhibit references against case documents.

What is hearsay in a civil witness statement and how is it flagged?

Hearsay in a civil witness statement is reported fact rather than first-hand knowledge. It is flagged during paragraph-by-paragraph classification to highlight evidential weaknesses and source support gaps.

How do I check exhibit references and statement of truth in a draft witness statement?

Check exhibit references and statement of truth by producing a dedicated checklist that verifies all factual assertions tie to supplied documents and meet current PD 57AC requirements before filing.

Does witness statement review work for PD 57AC and multi-track cases in England and Wales?

Witness statement review applies to England and Wales civil proceedings, specifically flagging PD 57AC-related concerns and marking rule checks as verify_current_rule when orders or requirements are unclear.

What is the best way to identify unsupported assertions in a witness statement draft?

The best way to identify unsupported assertions is source support checking, which ties factual claims to supplied case documents and flags missing sources or documentary conflicts.

What to do when a witness statement contains fact inconsistencies or argumentative content?

When a witness statement contains fact inconsistencies or argumentative content, generate escalation questions for the solicitor and suggested fixes to resolve drafting risks before exchange.