verification-before-completion

Run full verification commands before claiming completion or success.

4|1|Updated Jan 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/jordanhindo/Turtlez --skill verification-before-completion-jordanhindo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-before-completion
Source: https://github.com/jordanhindo/Turtlez/tree/main/.claude/skills/verification-before-completion
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/jordanhindo/Turtlez --skill verification-before-completion-jordanhindo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Prevents accidental dishonesty and missed failures by ensuring you only claim completion after running a fresh verification command and confirming the output.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Fresh verification before success claims: Enforces evidence-first communication for tests, builds, linting, and completion status.
  • Clear gatekeeping workflow: Guides you to identify the proving command, run the full command, read full output, and only then claim results.
  • Red-flag suppression: Blocks common “looks done” phrasing like “should pass,” “done,” or relying on partial checks or agent-reported success.
  • Regression and requirement integrity: Encourages red-green verification, symptom re-testing, and checklist-based confirmation against stated requirements.

Quick Start

Before you say “tests pass” or “it’s fixed,” run the full verification command for this change and confirm the exit status and output indicate success.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-before-completion

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify tests pass before claiming a build is complete?

To verify tests pass before claiming completion, you must identify the proving command, run the full command to collect fresh output, read the exit code, and only report success if the evidence confirms it.

What is the best way to prevent false completion claims in CI workflows?

Preventing false completion claims in CI workflows requires an evidence-first approach: running fresh verification commands for linting, builds, and tests, then blocking common "looks done" phrasing until output confirms success.

Why should I run fresh verification commands instead of relying on agent-reported success?

Relying on agent-reported success or partial checks causes missed failures and accidental dishonesty, so running fresh verification commands ensures you read actual exit codes and regression results before communicating task completion.

How do I enforce evidence-first communication for bug fixing and regression checks?

Enforce evidence-first communication for bug fixing by applying a clear gatekeeping workflow: identify the proving command, run it fully, read the output, and only claim results after confirming the evidence against stated requirements.

Can I use verification checks for release readiness without running the full command?

No, release readiness verification requires running the full command with fresh output to confirm the exit status, as the workflow blocks red-flag phrasing like "should pass" or "done" when partial checks or stale evidence are used.

When do I need to run linting and build verification during software engineering tasks?

You need to run linting and build verification during software engineering tasks whenever you intend to claim work is complete, ensuring you perform red-green verification and symptom re-testing against stated requirements before reporting.