verification-loop

Automate end-to-end verification for Claude Code sessions with build, type, lint, test, security, and diff checks.

8|Updated Apr 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/D0NMEGA/donnyclaude --skill verification-loop-d0nmega
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verification-loop
Source: https://github.com/D0NMEGA/donnyclaude/tree/main/packages/skills/verification-loop
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/D0NMEGA/donnyclaude --skill verification-loop-d0nmega

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Automates end-to-end verification for Claude Code sessions, ensuring code changes meet quality gates before PRs.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Builds and type-checks across languages to detect regressions early.
  • Linting and test suites with coverage reporting to enforce standards.
  • Security scans and diff reviews to surface potential risks and unintended changes.
  • Generates a structured verification report suitable for PR reviews and sign-off.

Quick Start

Run the verification loop after code changes to generate a PR-ready report.

Frequently Asked Questions about verification-loop

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate quality assurance checks before creating a pull request?

Automate quality assurance by running an end-to-end verification loop that applies build, type, lint, test, security, and diff checks to ensure code changes meet quality gates before PRs.

What is included in a pre-PR verification report for code changes?

A verification report includes pass/fail status across build, type, lint, tests, security scans, and diff reviews, along with recommended fixes to ensure code readiness for PR sign-off.

How do I run type-checks and linting across different programming languages?

Run an automated verification loop to execute builds and type-checks across languages, detecting regressions early and enforcing linting standards with test coverage reporting.

Can I use an automated diff review to surface unintended code changes?

Yes, automated diff reviews surface potential risks and unintended changes by inspecting code differences, while security scans identify vulnerabilities before generating a structured verification report.

What's the best way to secure code sessions before submission?

Secure code sessions by executing security scans and diff reviews within a verification loop, producing a structured report with pass/fail status and recommended fixes for PR reviews.