verify

Audit research implementations against published papers across five fidelity dimensions.

24|3|Updated Feb 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Borda/AI-Rig --skill verify-borda
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: verify
Source: https://github.com/Borda/AI-Rig/tree/main/plugins/research/skills/verify
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Borda/AI-Rig --skill verify-borda

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Audits research implementations to ensure code faithfully implements published paper methods across five evaluation axes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Five-dimension fidelity audit: formula matching, hyperparameter parity, eval protocol, notation consistency, and citation chain.
  • Generates a structured claims table and remediation notes to guide fixes.
  • Integrates with research workflows to validate implementations after deriving methods from literature.

Quick Start

Invoke the verify workflow with a paper input, for example: /research:verify <paper.pdf|arxiv-url|'pasted text'>.

Frequently Asked Questions about verify

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify if my code implementation matches a research paper?

To verify code against a research paper, you audit the implementation across five dimensions: formula matching, hyperparameter parity, evaluation protocol, notation consistency, and citation chain. This structured verification extracts claims from the paper and aligns them with code references to produce a fidelity report.

What is reproducibility verification in machine learning research?

Reproducibility verification in machine learning research is the process of auditing an implementation to ensure it faithfully executes the methods described in a published paper. It involves checking formula matching, hyperparameter parity, and evaluation protocols to confirm experimental alignment.

How to audit hyperparameters and formulas against an ML paper?

You audit hyperparameters and formulas by extracting specific claims from the paper text and aligning them with repository code references. The audit generates a structured claims table and remediation notes to guide fixes for any hyperparameter parity or formula matching discrepancies.

Can I use an arxiv URL to check code fidelity against a published paper?

Yes, you can use an arxiv URL to check code fidelity. The verification workflow accepts paper inputs as PDF files, arxiv URLs, or pasted text to extract claims and compare them against your repository code across five evaluation axes.

What are the limitations of auditing experiment verification for ML research?

A limitation of experiment verification is that it primarily targets research workflows where you have already implemented a method from a paper. It requires both the paper content and repository code to produce a structured verification report, meaning incomplete implementations or inaccessible paper text may limit the audit.

Does the verify workflow generate a report for code alignment issues?

Yes, the verify workflow generates a structured claims table and remediation notes for code alignment issues. It identifies discrepancies across formula matching, hyperparameter parity, evaluation protocol, notation consistency, and citation chain to guide your fixes.