skills.rest
zivtech
zivtechOFFICIAL
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

webchick-review

Evaluate patches or MRs using webchick's review criteria and verdict framework.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
Search Tags:#review#patch#code-review#drupal#verdict#drupal.org#issue-queue
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/zivtech/drupal-core-bot --skill webchick-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: webchick-review
Source: https://github.com/zivtech/drupal-core-bot/tree/main/skills/webchick-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/zivtech/drupal-core-bot --skill webchick-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Provides a structured, persona-driven review process to evaluate code changes as Angie Byron (webchick) would, ensuring consistency with her review approach.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Applies webchick's review criteria, voice, and verdict framework to patches, MRs, or diffs.
  • Produces reviewer-style feedback suitable for drupal.org comments and patch reviews.
  • Serves as a reference for maintaining consistent tone and policy across Drupal contributions.

Quick Start

Read and apply the provided review criteria to a given patch to generate a reviewer-style assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions about webchick-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a Drupal patch the way webchick does?▼

Review a Drupal patch the webchick way by applying Angie Byron's review criteria, voice, and verdict framework to your code change. The evaluation applies criteria in priority order and outputs a verdict of RTBC, needs work, or needs discussion.

What is the verdict framework used for drupal.org issue queue reviews?▼

The verdict framework for drupal.org issue queue reviews evaluates patches to produce one of three outcomes: RTBC, needs work, or needs discussion. It generates reviewer-style feedback grounded in public evidence and structured for drupal.org comments.

How do I generate code review feedback for a Drupal merge request?▼

Generate code review feedback for a Drupal merge request by evaluating the MR against webchick's review criteria. The process produces reviewer-style feedback suitable for drupal.org, applying criteria in priority order and referencing public evidence.

Can I use this review criteria for code changes outside the drupal.org issue queue?▼

This review criteria applies webchick's persona-driven review process to patches, MRs, or diffs. While it produces feedback suitable for drupal.org, you can evaluate any code change using the structured verdict framework and criteria priority order.

What does a webchick-style patch review include in the final assessment?▼

A webchick-style patch review includes structured feedback grounded in the public record, a verdict of RTBC, needs work, or needs discussion, and reviewer-style comments suitable for drupal.org. It applies review criteria in priority order to the code change.

Related Skills

Explore More Software Engineering Skills→
jwbaldwinjwbaldwin

code-review

Review GitLab Merge Requests for code quality and maintainability issues.

Community
Advanced
LetPeopleWorkLetPeopleWork
16

code-review-checklist

Evaluate code plans and implementations against structured review criteria with severity levels.

Official
Basic
kanopikanopi
16

drupalorg-issue-helper

Draft HTML-formatted drupal.org issue reports with structured guidance.

Official
Intermediate
BellaBeBellaBe
37

evaluative-action

Evaluate artifacts against criteria and output verdicts with evidence tables.

Community
Intermediate