What problem does it solve?
This Skill helps legal teams avoid expensive worker misclassification by evaluating whether a proposed engagement is more like an employee, an independent contractor, a staffing-agency temp arrangement, or a vendor/SOW—based on jurisdiction tests and the facts provided.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Prospective-only classification gate: Stops if the engagement has already started, and escalates as a remediation-sensitive retroactive risk question.
- Jurisdiction- and purpose-specific testing: Runs the applicable classification tests for the jurisdiction(s) and for the relevant legal purposes (e.g., payroll tax vs. state wage/hour vs. unemployment/workers’ compensation/benefits).
- Factor-by-factor scoring and gap analysis: Produces explicit test factor/prong results and highlights where the intended structure conflicts with what the facts support.
- Attorney-ready output and escalation triggers: Flags contested prongs and scenarios requiring counsel review, using the repo’s configured escalation policy and referenced internal classification guidance.
Quick Start
Ask for a prospective worker classification by running the skill with the command "/employment-legal:worker-classification" and describe the proposed role, control, compensation, exclusivity, tools, and jurisdiction where the work will be performed.