worker-reviewer-pipeline

Automated iterative code review uses a dual-agent workflow that coordinates worker and reviewer roles to enforce quality gates. The pipeline orchestrates cycles between an implementation agent and a validation agent until governance criteria are met.

A worker-reviewer pipeline is an agent-driven automation workflow that structures code review iterations between a Worker and a Reviewer. It ensures clear verdicts and quality assurance for feature work, refactors, and security updates before merging.

You can configure iteration limits and quality gates directly within the pipeline to enforce governance. The dual-agent workflow coordinates the worker and reviewer roles, automatically stopping iterations once the established quality criteria are satisfied.

Yes, automated code review workflows are designed for security-critical features where a Worker implements changes and a Reviewer validates them before merge. This iterative cycle ensures maintainability, security, and code quality standards are met.

The best way to structure code review cycles for refactoring is using an orchestrated dual-agent workflow. This coordinates worker implementation and reviewer validation iterations, applying quality gates to ensure structured governance over the changes.

No external dependencies are required to run the agent-driven code review pipeline. The workflow operates autonomously by orchestrating the worker and reviewer roles through configurable iteration limits and quality gates.