ai-peer-review-skill

Generate parallel critiques and meta-analysis for academic paper peer review.

56|5|Updated May 8, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AlexWortega/ai-peer-review-skill --skill ai-peer-review-skill
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ai-peer-review-skill
Source: https://github.com/AlexWortega/ai-peer-review-skill/tree/main
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AlexWortega/ai-peer-review-skill --skill ai-peer-review-skill

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill streamlines the peer review process for academic papers by automating independent, anonymized critiques through multiple Claude subagents.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Parallel review generation: Spawn multiple Claude reviewer agents simultaneously to evaluate a paper independently.
  • Meta-review synthesis: Combine individual reviews into a cohesive meta-analysis highlighting common and unique concerns.
  • Structured concern analysis: Extract a CSV table of reviewer concerns for detailed inspection.
  • Use Case: A researcher uploads a PDF manuscript, and the Skill produces multiple critiques, a synthesized meta-review, and a concerns matrix, saving weeks of manual peer review.

Quick Start

Upload a PDF of your paper and invoke the skill to generate expert-style peer reviews automatically.

Frequently Asked Questions about ai-peer-review-skill

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate academic peer review for a preprint manuscript?

Automate academic peer review by uploading a PDF manuscript to generate multiple independent critiques from parallel Claude subagents, which are then synthesized into a comprehensive meta-review report.

Can I generate structured feedback for conference submissions without manual reviewers?

Generate structured feedback for conference submissions by running parallel Claude agents that independently evaluate the paper and extract a CSV table of reviewer concerns for detailed inspection.

What is meta-review synthesis and how does it compile multiple paper critiques?

Meta-review synthesis combines multiple independent paper critiques into a cohesive meta-analysis, highlighting common and unique concerns extracted by parallel Claude subagents during the review process.

Does the automated peer review process work with PDF uploads?

The automated peer review process works by accepting a PDF upload of your academic paper, which triggers parallel Claude subagents to generate expert-style critiques and a concerns matrix.

What are the limitations of using AI agents for academic peer review?

AI agents for academic peer review automate independent critiques and meta-analysis, but function as a supplementary tool to save time rather than a complete replacement for human expert validation.

What is the best way to extract a matrix of reviewer concerns from a research paper?

Extract a matrix of reviewer concerns by running parallel Claude subagents to evaluate a research paper, which then compile structured feedback into a CSV table for detailed inspection.