Drafts grounded, venue-compliant rebuttals responding to external peer reviews.
npx skills add https://github.com/OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill aris-rebuttal
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: aris-rebuttal Source: https://github.com/OpenLAIR/dr-claw/tree/main/skills/aris-rebuttal Command: npx skills add https://github.com/OpenLAIR/dr-claw --skill aris-rebuttal
Responding to peer reviews after paper submission is stressful and error-prone: authors must cover every reviewer concern, stay within strict character limits, avoid fabricating evidence, and never overpromise. This Skill structures the entire rebuttal pipeline so no issue is dropped and every claim is grounded.
Run the rebuttal workflow on my paper directory and the pasted ICML reviews to produce a paste-ready response within the venue character limit.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Provide your paper source, raw reviews, and venue rules, then the workflow atomizes each reviewer concern into an issue board, builds a strategy plan with a character budget, and drafts a per-reviewer response. A paste-ready plain-text version is produced within the venue character limit.
The workflow enforces three safety gates: every factual statement needs a provenance source, every promise must be user-approved, and every reviewer concern must be answered or explicitly deferred. A Codex MCP stress test then flags unsupported claims or risky wording before finalizing.
Only when AUTO_EXPERIMENT is enabled. It then generates a mini experiment plan and invokes the experiment-bridge workflow, tagging results as user-confirmed evidence. By default it pauses and presents evidence gaps for manual handling instead.
No. It does not submit to OpenReview, CMT, or HotCRP, and it does not edit or upload a revised PDF. It produces a paste-ready text file with an exact character count that the author submits manually.
The workflow never invents experiments, numbers, derivations, or citations, so claims without existing evidence are blocked or narrowed to concessions. It also requires explicit venue rules and character limits before drafting, and follow-up rounds are capped per reviewer thread.
raja21068Parse external reviews into atomic issues and draft venue-compliant rebuttals.
lix965996-artDraft venue-compliant rebuttals from external reviewer feedback with provenance and coverage constraints.
duany049Parse review comments into Rvx-Cy items and generate evidence-backed rebuttals.
jandan138Generate venue-compliant rebuttal drafts from parsed external reviews.
