audit-context-building

Analyze code line-by-line to build architectural context for security audits.

Updated Jan 17, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mejango/juicy-vision --skill audit-context-building-mejango
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: audit-context-building
Source: https://github.com/mejango/juicy-vision/tree/main/.claude/plugins/audit-context-building/skills/audit-context-building
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mejango/juicy-vision --skill audit-context-building-mejango

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Enable audit teams to perform ultra-granular, line-by-line code analysis to build deep architectural context before vulnerability hunting.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Ultra-granular analysis of each function and block using First Principles, 5 Whys, and 5 Hows.
  • Persistent mental model: Build and maintain a global understanding across modules, files, and contracts.
  • Structured workflow: Phase 1 orientation, Phase 2 micro-analysis, and Phase 3 global system understanding for audits.

Quick Start

Activate audit-context-building on the target codebase to generate a full function-level micro-analysis.

Frequently Asked Questions about audit-context-building

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I build deep architectural context before a security audit?

Build deep architectural context for security audits by performing ultra-granular line-by-line code analysis using First Principles, 5 Whys, and 5 Hows to establish a stable mental model across modules.

What is the best way to perform line-by-line code analysis for vulnerability hunting?

The best way to perform line-by-line code analysis for vulnerability hunting is applying a structured workflow of Phase 1 orientation and Phase 2 micro-analysis to map thorough invariants and assumptions.

How does 5 Whys analysis work during a code architecture review?

5 Whys analysis works during a code architecture review by driving ultra-granular micro-analysis of each function block, ensuring you capture cross-function dependencies and risk considerations before threat modeling.

Can I maintain a persistent mental model across multiple files during a threat modeling session?

Yes, you can maintain a persistent mental model across files and contracts during threat modeling by generating cross-function dependency outputs that track system-wide invariants and assumptions.

Do I need a structured workflow to map cross-function dependencies in a security audit?

You need a structured workflow to map cross-function dependencies because it guides you from initial orientation through micro-analysis to global system understanding, preventing context loss across modules.

When should I not use first-principles code analysis for security audits?

You should not use first-principles code analysis when you lack time for ultra-granular line-by-line reviews, as this method requires thorough micro-analysis to yield accurate vulnerability hunting context.