clean-ai-writing-style

Reviews and rewrites Japanese AI-generated prose through a structured critique loop.

Updated May 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/TeXmeijin/agent-skills --skill clean-ai-writing-style-texmeijin
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: clean-ai-writing-style
Source: https://github.com/TeXmeijin/agent-skills/tree/main/.apm/skills/clean-ai-writing-style
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TeXmeijin/agent-skills --skill clean-ai-writing-style-texmeijin

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? AI-generated Japanese writing often suffers from logical leaps, knowledge gaps, vague verbs, empty conclusions, and awkward headings. This Skill replaces superficial word-level fixes with a rigorous critique loop that rebuilds text from structure down to expression, so articles, learning notes, and READMEs actually serve their readers. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Structured Critique Loop: Defines each section's job, builds a knowledge ledger, designs paragraph tasks, then runs separate Structure and Expression critics before rewriting. - Automated Text Audit: A Python script scans Japanese text for known failure patterns such as vague verbs, anthropomorphism, AI-style abstract nouns, and risky headings. - Reader-Driven Rewrites: Reference protocols cover full README rewrites, reader state transition flowcharts for article structure design, and a growth system that distills recurring feedback into a persistent failure-pattern store. - Use Case: Paste a draft article section and ask for a review; the Skill audits the text, maps what the reader knows before and after, identifies structural defects, and returns rewrite axes or a fully revised section. ## Quick Start Review this Japanese article section for logical leaps and AI-sounding phrasing, then rewrite it based on the section's actual job.

Frequently Asked Questions about clean-ai-writing-style

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review Japanese AI-generated writing for quality?

Run the critique loop: define the section's job, build a knowledge ledger of what readers already know, design paragraph tasks, then apply separate Structure and Expression critics. The included audit script flags vague verbs, anthropomorphism, and empty conclusions automatically.

How to detect AI-sounding phrases in Japanese text?

Use the audit_text.py script, which scans for pattern categories like vague verbs, AI abstract nouns, evaluation words, personification, and risky headings. Each hit must be justified or fixed rather than automatically treated as an error.

Can this skill rewrite an entire README for a specific audience?

Yes, the reader-driven rewrite reference handles full document overhauls. It defines the target reader and their decision goal first, restructures sections around that goal, verifies vocabulary against real usage in Japanese tech articles, and separates writing from critique contexts.

Does the writing review work without the failure-pattern knowledge store?

Yes, the knowledge store is optional. Without it, the critique loop and audit script alone drive the review. The store only adds accumulated failure patterns from past sessions, and setup instructions live in the growth reference.

What are the limitations of automated Japanese writing audits?

Pattern hits are not automatically errors; each must be judged in context. The audit cannot detect factual inaccuracies, missing evidence, or process-level failures like unverified claims, which require the manual critique steps instead.