council

Orchestrate multi-advisor debates to decide architecture, technology, or product options.

Updated May 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/JBonfim/skill-developer --skill council-jbonfim
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: council
Source: https://github.com/JBonfim/skill-developer/tree/main/.agents/skills/council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/JBonfim/skill-developer --skill council-jbonfim

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The council skill helps teams make high-impact decisions by running a structured multi-advisor debate that surfaces tensions, preserves dissent, and produces actionable recommendations.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-advisor orchestration: Coordinates 3–5 archetype advisors to cover pragmatism, architecture, security, product value, and stress-testing.
  • Protocol-driven debate: Enforces steel-manning, evidence requirements, authentic priorities, and no false consensus.
  • Actionable synthesis: Outputs consensus points, unresolved tensions, a recommended path forward, dissenting view, and risk mitigation; in standard mode it also captures the user’s decision and revisit triggers.

Quick Start

Use the council skill to evaluate a risky architecture trade-off by asking the AI to run a multi-advisor debate with clear constraints and then synthesize the recommended path with risks and dissent.

Frequently Asked Questions about council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I resolve architecture trade-offs with multiple expert perspectives?

Architecture trade-offs are resolved by orchestrating a multi-advisor council debate that surfaces tensions, preserves dissent, and produces actionable recommendations. The debate uses 3–5 archetype advisors covering pragmatism, security, and product value to stress-test options.

What is the best way to stress-test a tech spec before implementation?

Stress-testing a tech spec requires protocol-driven debate where advisors steel-man opposing positions and provide evidence. This structured approach captures consensus points, unresolved tensions, and a recommended path forward with risk mitigation and dissenting views.

How do I analyze security risks and product prioritization dilemmas without relying on a single expert?

Security risk and product prioritization dilemmas are analyzed through multi-advisor orchestration that enforces authentic priorities and no false consensus. The council format extracts tensions and tracks position evolution across diverse perspectives.

Can I use structured debate for PRD review and product value assessment?

PRD review and product value assessment are supported by the council debate protocol. It applies archetype advisors to evaluate competing product options, capturing consensus, dissenting views, and revisit triggers for future evaluation.

When should I use a multi-advisor council instead of single-expert architecture review?

A multi-advisor council is needed for high-impact decisions requiring diverse perspectives rather than single-expert answers. Use it when facing risky architecture trade-offs or dilemmas where unresolved tensions and dissent must be formally preserved.