dismech-pr-review

Validate dismech PRs against the disorder knowledge base schema.

50|9|Updated Dec 4, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/monarch-initiative/dismech --skill dismech-pr-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: dismech-pr-review
Source: https://github.com/monarch-initiative/dismech/tree/main/.claude/skills/dismech-pr-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/monarch-initiative/dismech --skill dismech-pr-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps ensure PRs related to dismech disorder curation are reviewed for correctness, specificity, and schema alignment, reducing errors in knowledge base entries.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Review PRs for proper atomic pathophysiology entries, precise ontology terms, and complete evidence citing PubMed quotes.
  • Identify and fix term granularity gaps, inappropriate GO/HP/MAXO mappings, and missing required fields.
  • Provide drafting guidance and QA notes to improve PR quality before merging.

Quick Start

Review a PR by applying the guidelines in this skill to assess pathophysiology entries, term precision, evidence quality, and schema compliance.

Frequently Asked Questions about dismech-pr-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review ontology curation PRs for schema compliance?

To review ontology curation PRs for schema compliance, validate pathophysiology entries, term granularity, evidence quotes, and ontology mappings against the disorder knowledge base schema guidelines.

What is proper term granularity when curating disease pathophysiology entries?

Proper term granularity in pathophysiology entries requires using precise, atomic ontology terms rather than broad concepts, ensuring each entry accurately reflects the specific disease mechanism without overlapping definitions.

How do I validate PubMed evidence quotes in knowledge base curation PRs?

Validate PubMed evidence quotes in curation PRs by strictly checking that the quoted text directly supports the pathophysiology entry and verifying the referenced PubMed citations exist and match the claimed ontology mappings.

Can I check GO, HP, and MAXO ontology mappings for disorder knowledge base entries?

Yes, you can check GO, HP, and MAXO ontology mappings during PR review by identifying inappropriate annotations, verifying term existence, and ensuring the mappings align with the required schema structure for high-quality curation.

What are common schema validation errors in disease mechanism curation PRs?

Common schema validation errors in disease mechanism curation PRs include missing required fields, non-atomic pathophysiology entries, inappropriate ontology mappings, and incomplete evidence citing that lacks direct PubMed quotes.