docs-review

You can review technical documentation by evaluating structural integrity, clarity, and adherence to best practices. This skill analyzes heading hierarchy, paragraph length, and internal references to identify mechanical issues and generate a quality assessment report.

Rubric-based scoring for technical writing evaluates argument strength, evidence, content quality, structure, and audience fit. It provides a quantified quality score across multiple dimensions, helping technical reviewers identify top issues for targeted improvement.

Yes, you can evaluate RFCs and ADRs for structural integrity automatically. This skill extracts heading hierarchy, paragraph length, citations, and internal references to identify mechanical issues and generate a quantified quality score.

Assessing clarity and audience fit of a README involves evaluating content quality and structure against best practices. This skill provides a quantified quality score and surfaces top issues for targeted improvement across multiple dimensions.

The best way to identify top issues in a technical blog post is through rubric-based scoring that evaluates argument strength, evidence, and structure. This skill surfaces top issues and provides a quantified quality score for targeted improvement.

No dependencies or setup are required. You simply provide the path to a documentation file, and the skill analyzes its structure and generates a quality assessment report evaluating clarity, structure, and technical accuracy.