expert-misaki-discussion

Structured divergence to convergence discussion is facilitated by running a five-turn expert-pair debate that oscillates between abstract diagnosis and concrete next actions. It automatically selects complementary expert personas and a fixed user-representative lens to finalize plans.

To log a debate for later review, the system automatically preserves the full discussion as a separate file asset. This mandatory log captures the complete expert collaboration history, ensuring the five-turn reasoning process is available for future reference.

Divergence to convergence reasoning improves complex planning tasks by enforcing abstract-to-concrete alternation across five turns. This structured oscillation prevents discussions from remaining too general or too detailed, yielding a sharper, consensus-driven finalized plan.

Yes, you can switch to independent agent team execution by triggering specific flags or phrases. This optional mode activates independent agents for deeper, more surprising disagreement during strategy planning discussions.

A fixed user-representative lens is needed when expert ideas must be translated into practical understanding for actual user situations. The fixed Misaki lens adds real user perspective to the expert collaboration, ensuring the finalized plan is practical and actionable.