skills.rest
pradyumnasagar
pradyumnasagarCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
𝕏@pradyumnasagarGitHub

grant-review

Review research grant proposals using funder-specific criteria and structured rubrics.

6|2|Updated Jun 11, 2026
Search Tags:#grant review#peer review#research evaluation#research funding#review criteria
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/pradyumnasagar/open-research-skills --skill grant-review-pradyumnasagar
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grant-review
Source: https://github.com/pradyumnasagar/open-research-skills/tree/main/skills/peer-review/grant-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pradyumnasagar/open-research-skills --skill grant-review-pradyumnasagar

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps researchers and funding agencies by providing a comprehensive framework for reviewing research grant proposals, ensuring a thorough, unbiased, and constructive critique.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured Review Criteria: Offers detailed, funder-specific review criteria for NIH, NSF, ERC, and private foundations.
  • Section-by-Section Analysis: Walks through each section of the proposal, from Specific Aims to Budget and Timeline, with a detailed rubric.
  • Feasibility and Ethics Checks: Evaluates the realism of the project, the team's capability, and adherence to ethical guidelines.
  • Use Case: For a reviewer invited to assess an NIH R01 grant proposal, this Skill provides a step-by-step guide for a thorough, well-structured critique.

Quick Start

Review the grant proposal for "Project X" using the grant-review skill to ensure compliance with NIH review criteria and to produce a detailed written critique.

Frequently Asked Questions about grant-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review a research grant proposal against specific funder criteria?▼

To review a research grant proposal, this Skill applies structured, funder-specific criteria for NIH, NSF, and ERC to evaluate significance, methodology, and feasibility, generating a detailed written critique.

What is the best way to structure a peer review for an NIH R01 grant?▼

Structuring a peer review for an NIH R01 grant involves analyzing the proposal section-by-section from Specific Aims to Budget, applying detailed rubrics to ensure compliance with funding agency policies.

Can I use this to evaluate research funding proposals for private foundations?▼

Yes, you can evaluate research funding proposals for private foundations. The Skill provides structured review processes tailored to various funder guidelines, ensuring thorough analysis of project feasibility and ethics.

Do I need access to grant proposal materials to perform a research evaluation?▼

Yes, you need access to grant proposal materials and familiarity with funding agency policies. The research evaluation requires the full proposal text to assess team capability, project realism, and ethical adherence.

What sections of a research grant proposal are evaluated during the review?▼

The review evaluates all major sections of a research grant proposal, walking through each part from Specific Aims to Budget and Timeline using a detailed rubric to ensure a comprehensive critique.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
jrcjrccjrcjrcc
17

research-grants

Generate tailored grant proposal templates for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and NSTC.

Community
Advanced
Niksh-HiremathNiksh-Hiremath

critique

Assess design effectiveness and provide prioritized UX critique feedback.

Community
Advanced
zhenxuanshi-ship-itzhenxuanshi-ship-it
1

business-doc-integrity

Check enterprise documents for consistency, logic, and terminology alignment.

Community
Advanced
ovachieverovachiever
52

scholar-evaluation

Evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework with dimension-based scoring.

Community
Advanced