grill-me

Guide teams to stress-test plans by questioning assumptions and mapping decision branches.

7|1|Updated Mar 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Harmeet10000/skills --skill grill-me-harmeet10000
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: grill-me
Source: https://github.com/Harmeet10000/skills/tree/main/skills/backend/grill-me
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Harmeet10000/skills --skill grill-me-harmeet10000

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Relentlessly interrogates plans and designs to surface assumptions, dependencies, and trade-offs, ensuring all stakeholders reach a shared understanding before moving forward.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured interrogation to map decision branches and prune ambiguity.
  • Codebase-aware probing to align design questions with the actual implementation when relevant.
  • Collaborative clarifications that surface unresolved decisions and owner responsibilities.
  • Use Case: In a system architecture review, guide the team to walk through each decision branch, confirming inputs, constraints, and success criteria.

Quick Start

Initiate a design review session and ask a clarifying question for every major decision until all branches are resolved.

Frequently Asked Questions about grill-me

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I stress-test architecture assumptions during a design review?

A design review interrogates plans by applying a structured questioning flow to map decision branches and surface hidden assumptions. This ensures stakeholders align on constraints and resolve unresolved decisions before implementation proceeds.

How do I resolve decision branches and align stakeholders on a product design?

You resolve decision branches and align stakeholders by conducting collaborative clarifications that interrogate every major decision. This structured questioning maps dependencies, confirms success criteria, and prunes ambiguity until all branches are resolved.

Can I align design review questions with the actual codebase during a plan interrogation?

Yes, you can align design review questions with the actual codebase. The interrogation flow navigates through codebase exploration when relevant, ensuring that probing questions directly reflect the implementation and surface true dependencies.

What is the best way to surface unresolved decisions and trade-offs in a strategy plan?

The best way to surface unresolved decisions and trade-offs is to relentlessly interrogate the strategy plan. This structured approach clarifies assumptions, records dependencies, and maps owner responsibilities to ensure shared stakeholder understanding.

What are the limitations of using an interrogation flow for architecture reviews?

An interrogation flow for architecture reviews requires walking through each decision branch systematically, which necessitates dedicated time from all stakeholders. The process only succeeds when participants actively confirm inputs, constraints, and success criteria.