gsd-ns-review

Route user review intents to the appropriate quality gate skill.

1|Updated Sep 6, 2015
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/deerawan/dotfiles --skill gsd-ns-review-deerawan
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: gsd-ns-review
Source: https://github.com/deerawan/dotfiles/tree/main/claude/skills/gsd-ns-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/deerawan/dotfiles --skill gsd-ns-review-deerawan

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill routes a user's review or quality-intent request to the correct downstream review skill so you don’t have to manually choose the right workflow.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Code quality and correctness review routing: Sends requests to the proper code review skill, including an option to auto-fix findings.
  • Targeted audits and evaluations: Handles specialized review types such as UAT/acceptance audits, security phase review, AI response quality evaluation, and UI design/accessibility review.
  • Operational debugging and forensics routing: Matches “what’s failing” and investigation intents to the appropriate debug or forensic workflow.

Core examples: When you want to review code correctness you get gsd-code-review; when you want security review of a specific phase you get gsd-secure-phase; when you need UI design/accessibility review you get gsd-ui-review.

Quick Start

Tell the AI what kind of review you want (for example, “review this code for quality and correctness”).

Frequently Asked Questions about gsd-ns-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate routing code review and audit requests to the right workflow?

Intent-to-skill matching analyzes your review goal and directs it to the appropriate quality gate. This routing mechanism selects the correct specialized workflow for code review, security audits, or UI evaluation, eliminating manual selection.

Can I trigger a security review or UI accessibility audit using a single intent?

Yes, a single review intent request triggers specialized routing. Requesting a security review invokes the secure phase gate, while UI design and accessibility evaluation routes directly to the dedicated UI review skill.

What is the best way to handle code review routing when I also need to fix findings?

Using fix mode is the best way to handle code review routing with fixes. After routing your correctness review intent to the code review gate, it supports a direct invocation pathway to automatically address identified findings.

Does debugging and forensics routing work for operational failure investigations?

Debugging and forensics routing works for operational failure investigations by matching failure intents to the appropriate debug or forensic workflow. It selects the correct specialized skill based on your investigation goals and quality scenario.

When do I need a quality gate router instead of calling a code review skill directly?

You need a quality gate router when your review intent spans multiple domains like code correctness, security, or acceptance audits. It prevents manual workflow selection by automatically matching your specific goal to the correct specialized review skill.