What problem does it solve?
Manually revising research manuscript sections through repeated rounds of writing and peer feedback is time-consuming, inconsistent, and difficult to track. This skill automates the entire loop between the paper-writer and reviewer agents, eliminating manual coordination and ensuring every revision is logged and trackable.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Automated Writer-Reviewer Loop: Coordinates the @paper-writer and @reviewer agents to revise a single manuscript section iteratively until it is approved, blocked by critical issues, or the iteration cap is reached.
- Automatic State Tracking: Logs all review issues, iteration counts, and section status to reviews.json and paper.json, with support for safe re-runs and resuming interrupted or blocked runs.
- Venue-Aware Reviewing: Adjusts reviewer strictness based on the target publication venue, and enforces guardrails like blocking runs with unresolved [TBD:] markers to prevent fabricated content.
- Use Case: When finalizing the results section of a conference paper, use this skill to automatically iterate between writing and reviewing until the section meets venue standards, with all feedback and version history preserved for transparency.
Quick Start
Invoke the iterate-revision skill by providing the file path to the manuscript section you wish to revise to launch the automated writer-reviewer revision loop.
