Verified:GitHub

scientific-critical-review

Analyze scholarly manuscripts for structural, logical, and interpretive weaknesses and generate revision recommendations.

3|1|Updated Feb 11, 2026

Search Tags:#research-writing #peer-review #academic-writing #manuscript-revision #critical-review #literature-analysis

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/nahisaho/satori --skill scientific-critical-review

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: scientific-critical-review
Source: https://github.com/nahisaho/satori/tree/main/src/.github/skills/scientific-critical-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nahisaho/satori --skill scientific-critical-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps researchers systematically critique academic drafts by identifying weaknesses in structure, reasoning, and data interpretation, and by generating concrete revision suggestions to strengthen the manuscript.

Core Features & Use Cases

Structured evaluation across the drafting process (structure, argumentation, interpretation, and limitations).
Multi-pass revision workflow inspired by a five-pass critique pipeline to guide targeted improvements.
Self-review support after drafting by providing a clear plan for revisions, including concrete text edits and supporting evidence.

Quick Start

Provide your draft and prompt the skill to perform a critical review and generate concrete revision suggestions.

Frequently Asked Questions about scientific-critical-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I critically review my academic manuscript before submission?▼

To critically review an academic manuscript, you need a structured evaluation that identifies structural, logical, and interpretive weaknesses. This process generates concrete revision recommendations and a reformulated manuscript plan to strengthen your draft before peer review.

What is the best way to revise research papers based on peer-reviewer comments?▼

Revising research papers based on reviewer comments requires analyzing the feedback to address structural and logical weaknesses. A multi-pass critique pipeline generates targeted text edits and supporting evidence, producing a comprehensive revision plan to guide your response and manuscript updates.

How do I identify logical weaknesses in my scholarly writing?▼

Identifying logical weaknesses in scholarly writing involves applying a multi-layer depth review framework across all sections. This systematic critique evaluates argumentation and data interpretation, outputting specific revision notes that pinpoint where reasoning fails and how to correct it.

Can I use a structured framework to evaluate manuscript drafts section by section?▼

You can evaluate manuscript drafts section by section using a seven-layer depth review framework. This approach applies structured evaluation from the Abstract to Conclusions, generating a reformulated manuscript plan with concrete text edits and supporting evidence for each section.

What does a multi-pass critique pipeline do for manuscript revision?▼

A multi-pass critique pipeline guides targeted improvements by systematically analyzing manuscript drafts across multiple iterations. It identifies weaknesses in structure, reasoning, and data interpretation, ultimately generating concrete revision suggestions and a clear plan for revisions.

When do I need a critical review for literature analysis and manuscript drafting?▼

You need a critical review for literature analysis and manuscript drafting when preparing for pre-submission revisions. It enforces a structured evaluation of argumentation and interpretation weaknesses, providing concrete text edits and a revision plan to ensure scholarly rigor.