kiro-validate-design

Validate technical design readiness by executing an interactive review against established guidelines, checking architecture alignment, consistency, and risk areas to deliver a structured GO/NO-GO decision with actionable feedback.

A GO/NO-GO decision in architecture-heavy feature design is the outcome of an interactive review validating integration points, data flows, and risk areas against requirements to determine implementation readiness.

Run an interactive design review by loading the feature spec, requirements, and design documents, applying steering context to evaluate integration points and data flows against established criteria.

Yes, you can use this design review process for architecture-heavy features by loading existing spec and design docs to validate type safety, extensibility, and architecture alignment before generating a GO/NO-GO decision.

An interactive design review provides structured feedback including prioritized critical issues, actionable next steps, and traceability to requirements and design documents to guide implementation follow-up.

A structured GO/NO-GO design review should not be used for lightweight features lacking architecture complexity, as the process specifically targets architecture-heavy features requiring validation of integration points and risk areas.