memo

Scaffold IRAC legal memos with research-gap flags and blank conclusions.

100|16|Updated May 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill memo-zekaisuni
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: memo
Source: https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish/tree/main/legal-clinic/skills/memo
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ZekaiSuni/claude-for-legal-turkish --skill memo-zekaisuni

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill structures a student’s legal case analysis into a clear IRAC memo while explicitly marking what must be researched, so the memo is drafted correctly without jumping to unsupported conclusions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • IRAC scaffolding for each issue: Turns intake facts into issue questions and provides separate Rule, Application, and blank Conclusion sections.
  • Research-gap prompting: Inserts RESEARCH NEEDED blocks for rule elements and remedies, with optional unverified framework starters.
  • Student-focused drafting workflow: Leaves [STUDENT ANALYSIS] and [STUDENT CONCLUSION] for the student to fill, plus strengths/weaknesses/open questions and a consolidated research-gaps summary.
  • Guardrails for citation reliability: Reminds users that any framework/citations are unverified and must be checked using their research tools before reliance.

Quick Start

Ask the assistant to run /memo to generate an IRAC scaffold memo template from your case intake notes, leaving the student analysis and conclusion blocks blank for you to complete.

Frequently Asked Questions about memo

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I structure a legal case memo using IRAC without jumping to unsupported conclusions?

To structure a legal case memo using IRAC without unsupported conclusions, use a scaffolding tool that transforms intake facts into issue questions while leaving conclusion sections blank. This enforces separate Rule, Application, and Conclusion blocks for objective legal analysis.

What is the best way to identify research gaps in a student law clinic memo?

The best way to identify research gaps in a law clinic memo is to use automated research-gap prompting. This inserts explicit markers for missing rule elements and remedies, generating a consolidated research-gaps summary to guide your next steps.

How do I draft an IRAC case analysis from intake notes?

To draft an IRAC case analysis from intake notes, input raw case summaries into a scaffolding workflow. The system generates structured Rule, Application, and blank Conclusion sections, inserting [STUDENT ANALYSIS] templates for you to complete.

Can I use AI generated IRAC memos for citation verification in legal research?

You cannot rely on AI generated IRAC memos for citation verification. Frameworks and citations provided are unverified, requiring you to manually check all legal citations and rules using dedicated research tools before reliance.

Does IRAC scaffolding work for clinic workflows with unresolved case conclusions?

Yes, IRAC scaffolding works for clinic workflows by intentionally keeping conclusions blank. It provides [STUDENT CONCLUSION] blocks and flags unresolved issues, ensuring students complete the final legal analysis manually.