oiticica-word-formation

Identify and correct English word-formation errors with objective rubrics.

10|Updated May 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/pasunboneleve/oiticica-style --skill oiticica-word-formation
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: oiticica-word-formation
Source: https://github.com/pasunboneleve/oiticica-style/tree/main/src/oiticica-word-formation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pasunboneleve/oiticica-style --skill oiticica-word-formation

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It prevents word-level errors—wrong inflections, broken derivatives, false stems, and invented forms—that make English prose feel incorrect or artificial.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Repairs word formation defects: identifies the specific broken morphological relation and supplies the correct established form (or a well-formed technical coinage).
  • Produces objective, testable rubrics: judges revisions using concrete checks (e.g., whether the fault is correctly named and the replacement is defensible).
  • Keeps meaning and respects boundaries: preserves supplied source-model text exactly and distinguishes invented examples from quoted ones.

Quick Start

Use oiticica-word-formation to review and repair word-formation errors in this paragraph, including a clear Weak/Fault/Better contrast and an objective rubric.

Frequently Asked Questions about oiticica-word-formation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I fix malformed word inflections and invented derivatives in English prose?

To fix word formation errors, identify the broken morphological relation and supply the correct established English form. This process targets wrong inflections, false stems, and invented derivatives that make prose feel incorrect or artificial.

What is the best way to check English morphology during prose revision?

The best way to check English morphology during prose revision is to apply objective pass/fail rubrics. This validates that the specific fault is correctly named and the replacement form is defensible, ensuring morphological correctness controls readability.

How does word formation correction preserve quoted source text?

Word formation correction preserves supplied source-model text exactly by distinguishing invented examples from quoted ones. It evaluates weak passages against strong source-models without altering the original boundaries of the referenced text.

Can I use objective rubric checks for technical coinages in grammar correction?

Yes, you can use objective rubric checks for technical coinages in grammar correction. The process judges revisions using concrete checks to determine if a fault is correctly named and whether a well-formed technical coinage is defensible.

When do I need to review stems and derivatives for readability?

You need to review stems and derivatives for readability when word-level errors make English prose feel incorrect. Correcting malformed inflections and false stems ensures the text meets standard morphology and perceived correctness standards.

Why does word formation correction produce Weak/Fault/Better contrasts?

Word formation correction produces Weak/Fault/Better contrasts to clearly define morphological defects. It pairs the weak passage with a better, defensible replacement and justifies the revision using an objective pass/fail rubric for strong source-models.