paper-claim-trace

Trace manuscript claims to result files and decision rules.

1|Updated Dec 13, 2025

Search Tags:#research reporting #academic integrity #evidence tracing #manuscript claims #decision rule

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/stephendor/TDL --skill paper-claim-trace

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-claim-trace
Source: https://github.com/stephendor/TDL/tree/main/.agents/skills/paper-claim-trace
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/stephendor/TDL --skill paper-claim-trace

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill ensures that every claim in a manuscript is backed by evidence and reported accurately, reducing bias and improving transparency.

Core Features & Use Cases

Evidence Binding: Automatically links each claim to its corresponding result file and decision rule.
Decision Rule Locking: Ensures that prose follows the pre-registered decision rule.
Honest Reporting: Prompts users to report negative or weaker results honestly.
Compliance with Standards: Helps adhere to academic and ethical standards for reporting research findings.

Quick Start

Run the paper-claim-trace skill on your manuscript to automatically trace and validate claims.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-claim-trace

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I trace manuscript claims back to their evidence and decision rules?▼

To trace manuscript claims, link each statement to its corresponding result file and pre-registered decision rule. This evidence binding validates research reporting and ensures academic integrity by verifying accurate, transparent claim derivation.

What is decision rule locking in academic research reporting?▼

Decision rule locking ensures that manuscript prose strictly follows the pre-registered decision rule. This mechanism enforces honest reporting of negative or weaker results and maintains compliance with ethical standards for research findings.

What files do I need to validate research claims in a manuscript draft?▼

Validating research claims requires three inputs: the manuscript document, result files containing the data, and the decision rules. These components allow the system to automatically trace and verify every claim accurately.

Can I check if my manuscript accurately reports negative or weaker results?▼

Yes, honest reporting checks prompt you to report negative or weaker results accurately. By locking prose to pre-registered decision rules, the system reduces bias and ensures full disclosure of all research findings.

How does evidence binding improve academic integrity in manuscript drafts?▼

Evidence binding improves academic integrity by automatically linking every manuscript claim to its specific result file and decision rule. This transparent validation reduces reporting bias and ensures accurate disclosure of research findings.

Are there limitations to automating research claim validation for manuscripts?▼

A limitation is that claim validation requires complete inputs: result files, decision rules, and the manuscript draft. Without pre-registered decision rules, the system cannot lock prose or verify evidence binding for academic compliance.