paper-reviewer

Name: paper-reviewer
Availability: InStock
Author: Chanw-research

Evaluate scientific manuscripts for methodology, statistics, and reporting standards.

38|3|Updated May 7, 2026

Search Tags:#statistics #reproducibility #peer-review #manuscripts #reporting-guidelines #research-ethics #scientific-evaluation

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing --skill paper-reviewer-chanw-research

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: paper-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing/tree/main/skills/paper-discipline/paper-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing --skill paper-reviewer-chanw-research

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Peer review is essential for ensuring rigor but can be time-consuming and inconsistently applied across disciplines. This skill provides a structured approach to evaluating manuscripts, focusing on methodology, statistics, reproducibility, reporting standards, and ethical considerations, and translates insights into actionable feedback for authors.

Core Features & Use Cases

Systematic evaluation of study design, statistics, and reporting quality.
Guidance on identifying red flags, baseline imbalances, and reproducibility issues.
Use Case: reviewers prepare comprehensive feedback for journal submissions or grant proposals, improving clarity and reliability.

Quick Start

Provide a thorough, structured peer-review evaluation for a manuscript you are about to review.

Frequently Asked Questions about paper-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I structure peer review feedback for a scientific manuscript?▼

Evaluate manuscripts as a journal reviewer by systematically assessing study design, statistics, and reporting standards. This structured peer review covers methodology, reproducibility, and ethical considerations to provide actionable recommendations for authors.

What reporting guidelines should I check when reviewing a clinical trial manuscript?▼

Enforce adherence to CONSORT, STROBE, and PRISMA reporting guidelines during manuscript evaluation. This ensures transparent data and analysis practices, improving writing clarity and reliability while identifying red flags in study design.

Can I use this structured peer review approach for grant proposals and journal submissions?▼

Yes, structured peer review applies to both journal submissions and grant proposals. It systematically evaluates study design, statistics, and reporting quality to help reviewers prepare comprehensive, actionable feedback across disciplines.

How do I identify statistical red flags and baseline imbalances during manuscript evaluation?▼

Identify statistical red flags and baseline imbalances through systematic evaluation of study design and statistics. This methodology-focused peer review highlights reproducibility issues, enforcing transparent data and analysis practices for reliable scientific evaluation.

What is the best way to ensure reproducibility and research ethics in manuscript reviews?▼

Ensure reproducibility and research ethics by enforcing adherence to reporting guidelines and promoting transparent data practices during manuscript evaluation. This structured peer review assesses methodological rigor and ethical considerations to produce actionable recommendations for reliable science.