What problem does it solve? Conducting rigorous, consistent peer review of scientific manuscripts, grant proposals, and presentations is time-consuming and error-prone, with reviewers often missing statistical flaws, reproducibility gaps, or reporting guideline violations. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Systematic Seven-Stage Review: Evaluates manuscripts section-by-section covering methodology, statistical rigor, reproducibility, figure integrity, ethics, and writing quality. - Reporting Standards Compliance: Checks submissions against discipline-specific guidelines including CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA, ARRIVE, and MIAME using built-in reference catalogs. - Structured Review Reports: Produces hierarchical feedback with summary statements, numbered major/minor comments, and actionable revision suggestions. - Use Case: A journal reviewer receives a clinical trial manuscript and uses this Skill to verify CONSORT compliance, detect p-hacking and pseudoreplication, assess figure integrity, and generate a constructive review report with prioritized comments. ## Quick Start Review the attached manuscript for methodological rigor, statistical issues, and reporting standards compliance, then generate a structured peer review report.
