plan-ceo-review

Generate a decision-ready plan with scope modes, risks, and tradeoffs.

Updated Mar 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/mattothomas/sp26_hackpsu --skill plan-ceo-review-mattothomas
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: plan-ceo-review
Source: https://github.com/mattothomas/sp26_hackpsu/tree/main/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-ceo-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/mattothomas/sp26_hackpsu --skill plan-ceo-review-mattothomas

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

CEO/founder-mode plan reviews to rethink problems, identify the 10x product, challenge premises, and expand or tighten scope across four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION, SELECTIVE EXPANSION, HOLD SCOPE, and SCOPE REDUCTION.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Four modes guide strategic direction: scope expansion, selective expansion, maximum rigor, and scope reduction to unlock bigger product outcomes.
  • Proactive, structured planning sessions that surface risk, dependencies, and tradeoffs; designed for startup teams and senior builders.
  • Works with prompts to surface ambitious directions, assess feasibility, and generate a decision-ready plan for leadership reviews.

Quick Start

Provide a CEO-style plan review for a given idea, outlining scope changes, risks, and a 10x direction.

Frequently Asked Questions about plan-ceo-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I conduct a CEO-level product strategy review to identify a 10x direction?

A CEO-level product strategy review challenges premises and rethinks problems to identify a 10x product direction. It uses four modes—scope expansion, selective expansion, hold scope, and scope reduction—to deliver a decision-ready plan with clear risks and tradeoffs.

What is scope expansion vs selective expansion in product roadmap planning?

Scope expansion in product roadmap planning rethinks the entire problem for broader impact, while selective expansion targets maximum rigor on specific high-value areas. Both modes proactively surface dependencies and tradeoffs to unlock bigger product outcomes.

How do I prepare a decision-ready product plan for leadership and startup teams?

To prepare a decision-ready product plan for leadership, provide a given idea to prompt a structured review. The process assesses feasibility, surfaces ambitious directions, outlines scope changes, and generates guardrails with edge-case considerations for startup teams.

When should I use scope reduction versus holding scope during roadmap discussions?

Use scope reduction during roadmap discussions to tighten focus and minimize risk, whereas holding scope maintains maximum rigor on the current trajectory. Scope reduction is ideal when tradeoffs indicate dependencies are too complex for the current startup team.

Can I use this strategic decision-making approach for startup scope discussions without external dependencies?

Yes, this strategic decision-making approach for startup scope discussions operates without external dependencies. It functions as a standalone planning framework to challenge premises, assess feasibility, and structure leadership reviews across product management workflows.

What are the limitations of using a 10x product direction framework for scope decisions?

The limitation of a 10x product direction framework is that ambitious scope expansion may introduce significant risks and tradeoffs. While it proactively surfaces edge-case considerations, startup teams must carefully evaluate if the generated dependencies align with current feasibility constraints.