positioning-icp

Build positioning stacks, ICP scoring models, and messaging architecture for AI products.

Updated Sep 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Peterson-Benhame/agent-skills --skill positioning-icp-peterson-benhame
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: positioning-icp
Source: https://github.com/Peterson-Benhame/agent-skills/tree/main/packages/skills-catalog/skills/%28gtm%29/positioning-icp
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Peterson-Benhame/agent-skills --skill positioning-icp-peterson-benhame

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? AI product teams struggle to define their ideal customer profile, sharpen positioning in fast-moving markets, and translate technical capabilities into business outcomes that close deals. This Skill provides structured frameworks for positioning, ICP scoring, messaging architecture, and quarterly PMF revalidation. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Four-Layer Positioning Stack: Build Category, Wedge, Proof Vector, and Alternative Framing layers using April Dunford's methodology adapted for AI products. - ICP Scoring with Enrichment Signals: Combine firmographic, technographic, and intent signals into Fit and Intent scores with a prioritization matrix and enrichment waterfall. - Three-Tier Messaging Architecture: Translate technical capabilities into business outcomes across strategic narrative, value proposition, and feature messaging tiers. - PMF Revalidation: Run a 90-day cycle with Sean Ellis surveys, cohort retention analysis, and competitive audits to detect PMF decay. - Use Case: A founder whose messaging is not converting asks for help; the Skill runs the "Would a VP forward this to their CFO?" test, rebuilds messaging tiers with proof vectors, and sets a 90-day revalidation cadence. ## Quick Start Ask the agent to define your ICP and positioning by providing your best customers, main alternatives, pricing model, and sales motion.

Frequently Asked Questions about positioning-icp

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I define an ICP for an AI product?

Build the ICP from three signal layers: firmographic (industry, size, funding stage), technographic (stack fit, API maturity), and intent (content consumption, trigger events). Score Fit and Intent separately, then prioritize accounts in an ACTIVATE/NURTURE/MONITOR/DISQUALIFY matrix.

How do I score and prioritize inbound leads?

Use a Fit Score weighted 40% firmographic, 35% technographic, and 25% behavioral, plus an Intent Score weighted 40% first-party, 35% third-party, and 25% trigger events. Route high-fit, high-intent accounts to sales with a response time under 4 hours.

What is a good Sean Ellis score for product-market fit?

A Sean Ellis score of 40% or more respondents answering "very disappointed" indicates PMF is achieved. Scores of 20-30% signal weak fit requiring ICP narrowing, while scores below 20% suggest a pivot is needed.

How often should AI product positioning be updated?

AI product positioning should be revalidated every 90 days because model capabilities, competitor launches, and buyer expectations shift quarterly. The cycle includes a Sean Ellis survey, cohort retention analysis, competitive audit, and ICP refresh.

Why does AI product messaging fail to convert?

Messaging fails when it leads with model names or technical capabilities instead of business outcomes. Apply the test: would a VP forward the message to their CFO to justify the purchase? If not, rewrite it at the correct altitude with quantified proof vectors.

When should I not use this positioning framework?

Do not use it for technical implementation, code review, or software architecture decisions. It is designed for GTM strategy work such as ICP definition, messaging, and PMF validation, not engineering tasks.