qbr-builder

Draft or review QBR documents with evidence-backed claims and internal/external separation.

58|21|Updated May 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/t0ddc3by/claude-for-customer-success --skill qbr-builder-t0ddc3by
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: qbr-builder
Source: https://github.com/t0ddc3by/claude-for-customer-success/tree/main/csm/skills/qbr-builder
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/t0ddc3by/claude-for-customer-success --skill qbr-builder-t0ddc3by

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It helps CSMs produce clear, evidence-based Quarterly Business Reviews that translate customer progress into value, metrics, and an aligned next-quarter plan.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Build or Review a QBR: Draft a new QBR from available account data or review and improve an existing draft for completeness and guardrail compliance.
  • Executive Brief Output: Create a customer-ready executive narrative variant without tables, tuned for decision-makers.
  • Internal vs External Separation: Produces an internal working document for the CSM and a customer-facing deliverable with no internal-only signals.

Quick Start

Use /csm:qbr-builder "Acme Corp" --draft to generate a complete QBR document for the account.

Frequently Asked Questions about qbr-builder

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I draft a Quarterly Business Review from scratch using account metrics?

Draft a Quarterly Business Review by providing the customer account name and available data, enabling the generation of value delivered, metric performance, and next-period priorities. The tool requires account-specific success criteria to build the document.

Can I generate an executive brief from a full QBR document for customer decision-makers?

Yes, generate an executive brief variant that provides a customer-ready narrative without tables, specifically tuned for decision-makers. This output separates internal working signals from the external deliverable.

How does this approach ensure evidence-based writing in customer success documents?

Evidence-based writing is enforced by requiring metric performance claims to be backed by sourced data, applying freshness checks, and separating internal/external documents to prevent unsupported statements in customer-facing deliverables.

What is the best way to review an existing QBR draft for completeness and compliance?

Review an existing QBR draft by running it through the compliance checker to evaluate evidence quality, verify success criteria alignment, and ensure proper separation of internal-only signals from the customer-facing deliverable.

Do I need predefined success criteria before generating a QBR?

Yes, predefined account-specific success criteria are required before generating a QBR. The tool uses these criteria to validate metric performance and structure the next-period priorities within the document.

What limitations exist when separating internal and external QBR content?

The internal working document contains CSM-only signals, while the external deliverable strictly excludes them. Limitations include the necessity of freshness checks for sourced data to maintain evidence-backed compliance across both outputs.