reasoning-primitives

Coordinate structured reasoning primitives to deepen AI analysis and surface hidden assumptions.

Updated Mar 15, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/JNZader/javi-ai --skill reasoning-primitives
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: reasoning-primitives
Source: https://github.com/JNZader/javi-ai/tree/main/own/skills/reasoning-primitives
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/JNZader/javi-ai --skill reasoning-primitives

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Composable reasoning primitives for enhancing AI analysis depth across explore, review, and decision workflows. They help surface hidden assumptions, missing dimensions, and counter-arguments, turning shallow analysis into rigorous insight.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Antithesize: Generate strongest counter-arguments to proposals.
  • Excavate: Dig beneath surface-level analysis to reveal hidden assumptions and root causes.
  • Dimensionalize: Identify missing perspectives and evaluation dimensions.
  • Negspace: Surface what is not being said or considered.
  • Synthesize: Combine analyses into a single, actionable recommendation.

Quick Start

Provide a representative proposal and apply the Antithesize primitive to generate a steel-man counter-argument.

Frequently Asked Questions about reasoning-primitives

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I surface hidden assumptions in my AI analysis?

To surface hidden assumptions in AI analysis, apply structured reasoning primitives like Excavate to dig beneath surface-level outputs and reveal root causes. This enforces rigorous evaluation to transform shallow proposals into deeper, validated insights.

Can I generate counter-arguments to validate a product proposal?

Yes, you can validate a product proposal by applying the Antithesize primitive to generate the strongest steel-man counter-arguments. This structured reasoning approach identifies vulnerabilities and missing perspectives before formalizing your decision workflow.

What is the best way to identify missing dimensions in decision-making workflows?

The best way to identify missing dimensions in decision-making workflows is to apply the Dimensionalize primitive. It enforces structured thinking to expose evaluation gaps and missing perspectives, ensuring comprehensive analysis across enterprise contexts.

How do I formalize decision workflows using structured thinking prompts?

You formalize decision workflows using structured thinking prompts by composing independent reasoning primitives supported by YAML frontmatter. You chain analyses like Negspace to surface omissions and Synthesize to combine them into actionable recommendations.

Does this approach work for exploring research ideas and proposals?

Yes, this approach works for exploring research ideas by applying composable reasoning primitives to your proposals. It enforces independent analytical steps to review ideas, surface what is not being considered, and synthesize rigorous insights.