review-all-gdds

A cross-GDD consistency audit checks multiple system design documents for dependency asymmetry, rule contradictions, stale references, and formula mismatches before architecture begins. It flags ownership conflicts and acceptance-criteria issues across all interdependent GDDs.

Game design holism review evaluates progression-loop competition, cognitive load risk, dominant-strategy traps, and economic imbalances across all system GDDs. You need it after MVP GDDs are approved and before architecture to prevent costly downstream design mistakes.

Auditing progression loops and economic balance across game design documents involves reading all authoritative GDDs together to detect loop competition, tuning ownership conflicts, and reward double-dipping. The review produces a structured report with severity classification for each imbalance found.

Yes, you can run a consistency-only check using the optional focus argument for faster passes. This limits the review to cross-document dependencies, stale references, and formula compatibility, skipping the broader progression and player-fantasy coherence evaluations.

Identifying dominant strategy risk and pillar drift requires scanning the authoritative GDD set to evaluate multi-system interaction scenarios. This surfaces compounding spikes, undefined behavior, and feedback contradictions that only become visible when all systems are read together.

Interaction-boundary scenario walkthroughs run multi-system player-perspective scenarios to surface broken state transitions, undefined behavior, and feedback contradictions. This approach detects compounding spikes and reward double-dipping issues hidden within individual GDDs.