review-biomedical

Runs a multi-agent audit of LaTeX and Typst biomedical documents for build, structural, scientific, and safety issues.

Updated Jan 20, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/yannickloth/health-me-cfs --skill review-biomedical
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-biomedical
Source: https://github.com/yannickloth/health-me-cfs/tree/main/.claude/skills/review-biomedical
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/yannickloth/health-me-cfs --skill review-biomedical

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Large biomedical manuscripts and repositories contain many interdependent failure modes — build errors, broken references, uncited or overstated scientific claims, domain-specific inaccuracies, and patient-safety risks — and manually checking all of these across files and formats is slow, error-prone, and safety-sensitive. This Skill provides an orchestrated, repeatable audit that surfaces structural, scientific, and safety issues so authors and reviewers can prioritize fixes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Orchestrates 20 specialized auditor passes in a deterministic sequence covering build & references, writing quality, scientific rigor, domain biology, pharmacology, safety, and publication readiness.
  • Supports LaTeX and Typst sources, resolves globs, performs keyword-gated domain audits, and aggregates per-agent findings into a single consolidated markdown report.
  • Produces resumable checkpoints to enable long reviews across limited contexts, reports skipped agents and errors, and enforces read-only audit mode so no files are modified.
  • Use case: run a full manuscript audit on contents/part2-pathophysiology/**/* to surface citation gaps, unsafe clinical recommendations, and domain-specific factual inconsistencies.

Quick Start

Run the review-biomedical skill on the target file glob (for example contents/**/*.tex) to generate an aggregate audit report and checkpoint in the runtime directory.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-biomedical

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit a biomedical manuscript for safety and citation gaps?

You can audit a biomedical manuscript by running a sequential, multi-pass review over LaTeX or Typst files to detect structural, scientific, domain-specific, and safety issues. The process aggregates per-agent findings into a single consolidated markdown report.

What does a multi-agent biomedical document review check for?

A multi-agent biomedical document review checks for build errors, broken references, writing quality, scientific rigor, domain biology, pharmacology accuracy, and safety risks. It operates read-only across LaTeX and Typst sources to surface issues without modifying files.

Can I audit Typst and LaTeX sources for pathophysiology or immunology errors?

Yes, you can audit Typst and LaTeX sources for pathophysiology or immunology errors. The review applies keyword-gated domain audits to specifically target factual inaccuracies in domain-focused chapters and biomedical repositories.

What is the best way to check large biomedical repositories for publication readiness?

The best way to check large biomedical repositories for publication readiness is using an orchestrated, deterministic sequence of 20 specialized auditor passes. This enforces a read-only audit mode and generates resumable checkpoints to handle long reviews across limited contexts.

Does the biomedical document audit modify my source files during review?

No, the biomedical document audit does not modify your source files. It enforces a strict read-only audit mode to ensure no files are changed while it analyzes your LaTeX or Typst manuscripts for clinical and scientific issues.