skills.rest
groundnuty
groundnutyCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
GitHub

review-paper

Automates academic manuscript evaluation across six dimensions and outputs a consolidated report.

Updated Apr 23, 2026
Search Tags:#research-writing#peer-review#manuscript-review#academic-evaluation#writing-feedback#editorial-decision
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/groundnuty/macf-devops-toolkit --skill review-paper-groundnuty
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: review-paper
Source: https://github.com/groundnuty/macf-devops-toolkit/tree/main/.claude/profiles/paper/skills/review-paper
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/groundnuty/macf-devops-toolkit --skill review-paper-groundnuty

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates a comprehensive, critique-driven evaluation of an academic manuscript, delivering structured feedback and recommendations at scale.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Supports default single-pass reviews, an adversarial critic-fixer loop, and a simulated peer-review pipeline with configurable journals.
  • Evaluates across six dimensions (Argument Structure, Identification Strategy, Econometric Specification, Literature Positioning, Writing Quality, and Presentation) and outputs a consolidated report with actionable suggestions.
  • Facilitates cross-artifact integration when manuscripts reference scripts or supporting materials, enabling automated checks and traceability.

Quick Start

Provide the manuscript path and select a mode to generate a structured, actionable review.

Frequently Asked Questions about review-paper

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate peer review for an academic manuscript?▼

You can automate academic manuscript evaluation by providing the manuscript path to trigger a simulated peer-review pipeline, which outputs a structured report with actionable feedback across six evaluation dimensions.

What is an adversarial review mode for manuscript evaluation?▼

An adversarial review mode is a critic-fixer loop that rigorously stress-tests academic manuscripts, identifying structural and econometric weaknesses before generating consolidated suggestions for editorial decisions.

How does automated manuscript evaluation handle referenced scripts and supporting materials?▼

Automated manuscript evaluation handles referenced scripts by performing cross-artifact integration, running automated checks against supporting materials to ensure traceability and consistency within the final review report.

Can I configure the peer-review pipeline to match specific academic journals?▼

Yes, you can configure the simulated peer-review pipeline by selecting specific journals, allowing the manuscript evaluation to align its critique and editorial recommendations with targeted publication standards.

What dimensions are evaluated during an automated academic manuscript review?▼

An automated academic manuscript review evaluates six dimensions: Argument Structure, Identification Strategy, Econometric Specification, Literature Positioning, Writing Quality, and Presentation, outputting a consolidated review report.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
Leo1349Leo1349

paper-writing

Orchestrate academic paper writing workflows from idea to manuscript.

Community
Advanced
pedrohcgspedrohcgs
1.5k

review-paper

Review economics and social science manuscripts for argument structure, econometrics, and citations.

Community
Advanced
vignesh2027vignesh2027
6

quant-researcher

Design testable research hypotheses and outline academic papers for finance and economics.

Community
Advanced
ZpankzZpankz
7

rct-appraisal

Appraise randomized controlled trials across six integrated frameworks with dual validation.

Community
Advanced