Review committee deliberation transcripts against predefined rubrics and generate feedback.
npx skills add https://github.com/pragsmike/cyberneutics --skill review-pragsmike
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: review Source: https://github.com/pragsmike/cyberneutics/tree/main/.claude/skills/review Command: npx skills add https://github.com/pragsmike/cyberneutics --skill review-pragsmike
This Skill provides an objective, independent assessment of committee deliberations, ensuring they meet rigorous standards for reasoning, evidence, and clarity, thereby improving decision-making quality.
Run an independent review of the most recent committee deliberation transcript.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Evaluating committee deliberations requires an independent review against predefined rubrics to assess reasoning completeness, adversarial rigor, and assumption surfacing. This Skill analyzes transcripts to identify logical gaps and generate actionable feedback for decision-making.
Yes, pasted transcript analysis is fully supported alongside direct invocation and situation-based review. The Skill processes the pasted transcript to evaluate evidence standards and trade-off explicitness, outputting a trustworthiness verdict for your decision input.
The independent evaluation uses five core rubrics: Reasoning Completeness, Adversarial Rigor, Assumption Surfacing, Evidence Standards, and Trade-off Explicitness. These rubrics score deliberation quality and pinpoint specific weaknesses requiring improvement.
No, this review process operates independently without requiring any external dependencies or integrations. You simply provide the committee deliberation transcript or situation context to receive the assessment and trustworthiness verdict.
The best way to improve strategic planning decisions is to run an independent review of meeting transcripts to surface unexamined assumptions and identify logical gaps. This generates concrete recommendations and a trustworthiness verdict before finalizing plans.
You should avoid automated review when live deliberation transcripts are unavailable or when decisions require real-time moderation rather than post-meeting evaluation. The Skill focuses on assessing past transcripts against reasoning and evidence rubrics.
stakworkDraft house-format board and committee meeting minutes with quorum checks.
andreyvitReview Zoo Workflow specs and active-subtask plans for correctness and completeness.
kimasplundExplore multiple solution paths in parallel and refine the best option.
All-The-VibesAssess software architectures across six dimensions and recommend trade-offs.
